employee from 01.01.2023 until now
Moscow City Pedagogical University (Institute of Foreign Languages, Assistant Professor)
employee from 01.01.2023 until now
811.521
In this work, the author analyzes the concepts of “Japanese speech etiquette”, “politeness in Japanese linguistic culture”, and “teaching polite style”, which are significant for teaching Japanese, as interpreted by various scientists: linguists, cultural scientists, and orientalists. It is argued that the study of these phenomena as interpreted by scientists will make it possible to determine the approaches that can be used as a basis for improvement of teaching polite style of verbal and non-verbal Japanese behavior to students of language universities learning Japanese for vocational purposes.
Japanese language, polite style, keigo, teaching politeness / polite communication style, linguoculturological approach
1. Alpatov V. M. Categories of Politeness in Modern Japanese. 6th print. Moscow: URSS, 2022. 152 p. (In Russian). Yazyki narodov mira.
2. Zabolotnova M. V. Specifics of the Implementation of the Gender Factor in Translation from Japanese (Morphosyntactic Level). Dissertation abstract. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Chelyabinsk, 2007. 26 p. (In Russian).
3. Klimenko O. K. “Category of Politeness and Speech Etiquette in Russian language”. Russkiy yazyk v sovremennom obshchestve (Funktsional’nyye i statusnyye kharakteristiki): collection of reviews. Ed. by E. O. Oparina, E. A. Kazak. Moscow: INION RAS, 2005. 85—101. (In Russian).
4. Krneta N. D. Male and Female Speech in Modern Japanese. Dissertation abstract. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Moscow, 2003. 23 p. (In Russian).
5. Maksimenko N. L. Teaching Performance as a Type of Prepared Monologue Speech to Students of a Language University (Japanese Language, Initial Stage). Diss. Cand. Sci. (Ped.) Moscow: Russian Academy of Education, 2009. Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy, 2009. 239 p. (In Russian).
6. Myznikova V. V. Comparative Analysis of Honorific Systems in the Korean and Japanese Languages. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Saint Petersburg U, 2013. St. Petersburg, 2013. 248 p. (In Russian).
7. Razdorskiy A. I. National and Cultural Features of Communication in Japanese Oral Dialogue. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Moscow: Voyennyy Krasnoznamyonnyy institut Ministerstva oborony SSSR, 1981. Moscow, 1981. 212 p. (In Russian).
8. Savinova A. V. Semantics and Pragmatics of Office Norms of Behavior: Based on the Russian, English and Japanese Linguistic Cultures. Dissertation abstract. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Volgograd, 2012. 18 p. (In Russian).
9. Svinina N. M. Business Style of the Japanese Language in Oral Form. Dissertation abstract. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Moscow, 2008. 22 [+ 2] p. (In Russian).
10. Seredenko V. M. Factors of Organization of Political Discourse: Communicative and Socio-Cultural Aspects (Based on the Material of Programmatic Speeches of Modern Japanese Politicians). Dissertation abstract. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Moscow, 2015. 24 [+ 4] p. (In Russian).
11. Tareva E. G. “Intercultural Educational Ideology in the Era of Geopolitical Transformations”. Dialog kul’tur. Kul’tura dialoga: v poiskakh peredovykh sotsiogumanitarnykh praktik: materialy Pervoy mezhdunar. konf. (Moskva, 14—16 aprelya 2016 g.). Gen. ed. by E. G. Tareva, L. G. Vikulova. Moscow: Yazyki Narodov Mira, 2016. 558—562. (In Russian).
12. Tareva E. G., Troinikova E. V. “Cultural Identity of a Person: Vectors of Informational Transformation”. Yazyk i kul’tura = Language and Culture 64 (2023): 45—64. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17223/19996195/64/3
13. Frolova E. L. Ethnosocial Functions of Name in Traditional Japan. Dissertation abstract. Cand. Sci. (Hist.). Tomsk, 2012. 28 p. (In Russian).
14. Khronopulo L. Yu. Imperative Semantics and Means of Its Expression in Modern Japanese. Dissertation abstract. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). St. Petersburg, 2007. 26 p. (In Russian).
15. Shigeko O. Ellipsis in Japanese Discourse: Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the Gradual Division of the University of California, Berkeley. Berkeley: U of California Publ., 1985. v, 228 p.
16. Yasutaka M. “Keigo to Use and to Be Used: Reevaluation of Keigo Learning in Japanese Language Classes”. Journal of Japanese Language Education and Linguistics 6.2 (2022): 142—153. https://doi.org/10.18196/jjlel.v6i2.14874
17. Miyamoto K. “Considerations Regarding the Education of Honorific Language: Focusing on Students’ Use of Honorific Language and Methods of Teaching Honorific Language”. National Association of Japanese Language Education in Universities Japanese Language Education Research: Conference Research Abstracts 113 (2007): 131—134. (In Japanese). https://doi.org/10.20555/jtsjs.113.0_131
18. Tao L., Yun S., Nishijima Yo. “Comparison of Everyday Individual Concepts of ‘Politeness’ among Japan, China, and Korea”. The Journal of the Study of Vocabulary 10 (2012): 1—12. (In Japanese).
19. Tokuma H. “How Japanese Language Learners Approach Honorific Language Learning and the State of Honorific Language Education”. Meiji Gakuin University Liberal Arts Education Center, 2019. 21—22. (In Japanese).
