employee
Russian Federation
128
The author problematizes the status of “experiment” that is constantly used to characterize the work of E. V. Ilyenkov and A. I. Meshcheryakov with blind deaf-mute educatees in the Zagorsk boarding school. Some arguments of Ilyenkov’s opponents are critically examined. An attempt is made to identify the nature and limits of the Zagorsk experiment, to show its significance going beyond the bounds of defectology. The adequacy of understanding of the soul as an unsolvable mystery has been questioned, and the specificity of its understanding by Ilyenkov from materialist positions is analyzed. In conclusion the author discusses the questions posed to the theory of the communist ideal by its critics.
Zagorsk experiment, E. V. Ilyenkov, deaf-blindness, thinking; science, soul
1. Vygotskiy L. S. “Community as Factor of a Defective Child’s Development”. Osnovy defektologii. By L. S. Vygotskiy. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1983. 196—218. (In Russian). Vol. 5 of Sobraniye sochineniy. 6 vols.
2. Hegel Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. The Science of Logic. Transl. G. Di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015. 866 p. Cambridge Hegel Translations.
3. Hegel Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Lectures on the History of Philosophy. Vol. 1. Transl. E. S. Haldane. Introd. by F. C. Beiser. Lincoln, NE: Univ. of Nebraska, 1995. 487 p.
4. Asmolov A. G., Bityutskaya E. V., Bratus B. S., Leontiev D. A., Ushakov D. V. “Dialogues On/In the Field of Meanings: To the 120th Anniversary of Alexey Nikolayevich Leontiev”. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 14: Psikhologiya = Moscow University Psychology Bulletin 46.2 (2023): 5—22. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.11621/LPJ-23-13
5. Dubrovsky D. I. “The Phenomenon of Deafblindness. Once Again about the Zagorsk Experiment (on the Facts of Falsification, Its Defenders and on the Actualization of the Problem)”. Filosofskiye nauki = Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 1 (2018): 89—117. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2018-1-89-117
6. Ilyenkov E. V. The Dialectics of the Abstract and the Concrete in Marx’s Capital. Transl. S. Syrovatkin. Delhi: Aakar Books, 2008. 294 p.
7. Il’yenkov E. V. “Dialectics of the Ideal”. Logos 1 (69) (2009): 6—62. (In Russian).
8. Il’yenkov E. V. “Letter to A. V. Suvorov”. Filosofiya i kul’tura: [collection]. By E. V. Il’yenkov. Moscow: Politizdat, 1991. 446—448. (In Russian).
9. Ilienkov E. V. “Psychology”. Publ. [with an introd.] by A. G. Novokhat’ko. Voprosy filosofii 6 (2009): 92—105. (In Russian).
10. Lobastov G. V. “Il’yenkov as Problem”. Obraz Eval’da Il’yenkova v vospominaniyakh: [collection]. Auth. and comp. G. Lobastov. Moscow: Russkaya panorama, 2024. 244—276. (In Russian).
11. Lobastov G. V. Agency as Problem of Ego. Moscow: Russkaya panorama, 2023. 328 p. (In Russian).
12. Lobastov G. V. Philosophical and Pedagogical Studies. Moscow: Mikron-print, 2003. 329 p. (In Russian).
13. Mareyeva E. V. “ ‘Zagorsk Experiment’ and the Problem of ‘Congenital’ Human Abilities”. Nauchnyye vedomosti BelGU. Ser.: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo = Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin ser. Philosophy. Sociology. Law 10 (231) (2016): 190—194. (In Russian).
14. Meshcheryakov A. I. Blind Deaf-Mute Children: Mental Evolution during Behavior Shaping. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1974. 327 p. (In Russian).
15. Morozov M. Yu. “Culture or Cultivation. E. V. Ilyenkov on the Contradictions of the Educational Process”. Vestnik MGUKI = Bulletin of Moscow State University of Culture and Arts 2 (118) (2024): 46—55. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24412/1997-0803-2024-2118-46-55
16. Putschaev Yu. “Again About the Unlearned Lessons of the Zagorsk Experiment (an Answer to A. D. Maidanskiy)”. Voprosy filosofii 8 (2019): 146—157. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S004287440006052-2
17. Samarskiy A. Yu. “Problem of the Ideal: On the Current State of Dispute between E. V. Il’yenkov and D. I. Dubrovskiy”. E. V. Il’yenkov: Ideal’noye. Myshleniye. Soznaniye: materialy XIV Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. “Il’yenkovskiye chteniya — 2012” (Moskva, 12-13 apr. 2012). [Ed. by E. V. Mareyeva]. Pt. 2. Moscow: Modern Univ. for the Humanities Publ., 2012. 12—21. (In Russian).
18. Suvorov A. V. “Lessons of the Zagorsk Experiment in the Context of Tiflo-Surdo-Psychology”. Elektronnyy sbornik statey portala psikhologicheskikh izdaniy PsyJournals.ru = E-Proceedings [of] PsyJournals.ru Psychology Review 6.2015-1 (2015): n. pag. PsyJournals. (In Russian). Web. 23 Nov. 2024. <https://psyjournals.ru/serialpublications/pj/archive/2015_1/76169>.
19. Siemek Marek J. „ ,Nauka‘ i ,naukowość‘ jako ideologiczne kategorie filozofii“. Racjonalność. Nauka. Społeczeństwo. Red. H. Kozakiewicz, E. Mokrzycki, M. J. Siemek. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1989. 255—274. (In Polish).
20. Siemek Marek J. „Poznanie jako praktyka (Prolegomena do przyszłej epistemologii)“. Marksizm w kulturze filozoficznej XX wieku. Red. M. J. Siemek. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1988. 9—24. (In Polish).
