employee
Russian Federation
employee
Russian Federation
The authors did summarize the concepts of "metadisciplinarity", "metasubject skills", and "metasubject educational results", and studied the application of these concepts in teaching foreign languages, as well as the metasubject skills requirements as for the Uniform State Exam participants in English. The data for study are the results of the Uniform State Exam in English in the KhMAO - Yugra (2023) that have been analyzed to assess the metasubject skills development in participants of Uniform State Exam. At conclusion the authors provide recommendations for teachers aimed at promoting the development of metasubject skills in school students and their further application in the educational process.
metadisciplinarity, metasubject activity, metasubject skills, metasubject educational results, Uniform State Exam, abilities, skills
1. Azimov E. G., Shchukin A. N. New Dictionary of Methodological Terms and Concepts: Theory and Practice of Language Teaching. Moscow: IKAR, 2009. 448 p. (In Russian).
2. Gormakova V. V. “On the Issue of the Differentiation of the Concepts ‘Metasubject Skills’ and ’Universal Educational Activities’ ”. Sibirskiy pedagogicheskiy zhurnal = Siberian Pedagogical Journal 6 (2018): 18—23. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.1806.02
3. Kuznetsov A. A. “About School Standards of the Second Generation”. Munitsipal’noye obrazovaniye: innovatsii i eksperiment = Municipal Education: Innovation and Experiment 2 (2008): 3—6. (In Russian).
4. Shekhovtsova L. D., Prokof’yeva I. V., Markova R. I., Molchanova E. A. “Meta-Subject Universal Skills”. Molodoy uchenyy 42 (176) (2017): 185—187. (In Russian).
5. Novikov A. M. Pedagogy: Dictionary of the System of Basic Concepts. Moscow: Izdatel’skiy tsentr IET, 2013. 268 p. (In Russian).
6. Prokhorov A. M., gen. ed. Russian Encyclopedic Dictionary. Book 2. Moscow: Bol’shaya Ros. entsikl., 2001. 1027—2015. (In Russian). 2 books.
7. Sipyagin V. A. “Preparation for the USE in English Language: Achieving Meta-Subject Results”. Molodoy uchenyy 19 (153) (2017): 334—337. (In Russian).
8. Tirinova O. I. “Shaping General Study Skills and Abilities”. Nachal’naya shkola = Elementary School 12 (2002): 100—104. (In Russian).
9. Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language. Comp. by G. O. Vinokur, B. A. Larin, S. I. Ozhegov et al. Ed. by D. N. Ushakov. Vol. 2. Moscow: Gos. in-t “Sovetskaya entsiklopediya”, 1938. 1040 clm. (In Russian). 4 vols.
10. Khramtsova N. V. “The Phenomena of ‘Metasubject’ in Modern Education”. Pedagogicheskiy IMIDZh = Pedagogical IMAGE 1 (30) (2016): 17—22. (In Russian).
11. Khutorskoy A. V. “Meta Subject Content of Education from the Perspective of Human Congruity Approach”. Vestnik Instituta obrazovaniya cheloveka 1 (2012): 15. (In Russian).
12. Khutorskoy A. V. “Five Levels of MetaDisciplinarity”. Narodnoye obrazovaniye 8 (1464) (2017): 69—80. (In Russian).
13. Shaikhutdinova F. F. “Metapobject — Relevance and Perspectives”. Kazanskiy vestnik molodykh uchenykh = Kazan Bulletin of Young Scientists 6.5 (2022): 35—44. (In Russian).
14. Shapoval Yu. R. “Metasubject in Education. Actuality and Perspectives”. Vestnik nauki i obrazovaniya 10-1 (64) (2019): 84—87. (In Russian).
