employee
Russian Federation
The author investigates the peculiarities of the aestheticization of natural existence in the act of creativity. Aspects of the aesthetic understanding of natural existence in ideological systems of various historical periods are considered — in ancient philosophy, Abrahamic religions, philosophy of unitotality, as well as in modern environmental aesthetics. The development of understanding of the beauty of nature and the essence of creativity in the philosophy of unitotality is traced. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of issues of modern ecology of creativity and environmental aesthetics. It has been concluded that the understanding of nature as the main factor in the formation of aesthetic views and creativity in the philosophy of unitotality expands to the dimension of natural existence as a whole (Cosmos), and in environmental aesthetics it takes on the character of a cultural concept. The transformation of the understanding of creativity goes from Inexistence at its core to the incompleteness of creation in its principle and the universality of its anti-entropic potential.
existence aestheticization, beauty, nature, creativity, culture, consciousness, art, worldview, ecological aesthetics
1. Vernigorova E. S. “Category of Beauty in Art as a Reflection of the Divine Principle in Aesthetic Concept [of] V. S. Solovyov”. Kul’turnoe nasledie Rossii = Cultural Heritage of Russia 2 (2014): 9—11. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TIBRNL.
2. Gerasimova I. A. “Principle of Beauty in Science”. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki = Epistemology & Philosophy of Science 30.4 (2011): 116—132. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OPDQMJ.
3. Guseva A. “Ecological Beauty: To a Question about Possibility of Typology”. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal issledovaniy kul’tury = International Journal of Cultural Research 1 (18) (2015): 13—23. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UMAYHL.
4. Douglas Stuart. The Apocalypse of the Reluctant Gnostics: Carl G. Jung and Philip K. Dick. New York: Routledge, 2018. 212 p.
5. Losev A. F. Summation of Thousand-Year Development. Vol. 8, book 2 of Istoriya antichnoy estetiki. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1994. 690 p. (In Rus sian). 8 vols.
6. Kiseleva N. A. “Gnostic Roots of Ideas and Images of Love in V. S. Solovyyov’s Philosophy”. Nauka. Iskusstvo. Kul’tura = Science. Arts. Culture 3 (7) (2015): 68—76. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SGGEQC.
7. Kuznetsova V. S. “Religious Art of Abrahamic Religions and Its Role in Religious Processes”. Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsial’nykh problem = Modern Studies of Social Issues 13.1 (2021): 31—51. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.12731/2077-1770-2021-13-1-31-51 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZWYZUZ.
8. Malinovskiy A. V. “The Ecology of Creativity”. Vestnik Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta = Bulletin of Altai State Agricultural University 1 (17) (2005): 180—184. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PDTDOZ.
9. Mungalov V. N. “The Ideological Differences between Buddhism and the Abrahamic Religions”. Psikhologiya v ekonomike i upravlenii = Psychology in Economics and Management 1 (2014): 145—148. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SQTITT.
10. Nevleva I. M. “Philosophy of the Creative Search: Cosmogenesis, Cosmic Eternal Development”. Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Seriya: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo = Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin ser. Philosophy. Sociology. Law 2 (121) (2012): 282—292. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RDUPHH.
11. Nesterova O. Yu. “Nature of Creativity in Phi losophy of Psychoanalysis”. Istoricheskie, filo sofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul’ turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki = Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice 5 (79) (2017): 123—125. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YMSEKV.
12. Soloviev Vladimir S. The Heart of Reality: Essays on Beauty, Love, and Ethics. Transl. by V. Wozniuk. Notre Dame, IN: Univ. of Notre Dame Press, 2020. xviii, 244 p.
13. Falko V. I. “ ‘Techne’ and ‘Poetry’ in Ancient and Modern Philosophy”. Izvestiya Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki = Izvestiya Tula State University ser. Humanitarian Sciences 1 (2020): 95—106. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QEPDBZ.
14. Berger Peter L. The Social Reality of Religion. London: Faber and Faber, 1969. 239 p.
15. Gregory Andrew. Early Greek Philosophies of Nature. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020. xiv, 242 p.
16. Niemoczynski Leon. “Nature’s Transcendental Creativity: Deleuze, Corrington, and an Aesthetic Phenomenology”. American Journal of Theology & Philosophy 34.1 (2013): 17—34. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjtheophil.34.1.0017
