employee
Kuzbass State Agrarian University named after V. N. Poletskov (Educational Technologies Department, Professor)
employee
Kemerovo, Russian Federation
UDC 316
UDC 141
From a philosophical perspective, the author examines the concepts of neo-Marxism and post-Marxism as the ideological foundation of modern institution of the state. The understanding of social phenomena in classical Marxism, neo-Marxism and post-Marxism is distinguished. The main trajectories of transformation of the ideas of classical Marxism are considered. The leading Marxist approaches to the consideration of the political are analyzed. The content of the conceptual apparatus of modern concepts of post-Marxism is systematized, in the unity of political connections and relations, and the transformation of the ideas of Marxism is analyzed. The explication of ideas in the volume of the state paradigm is shown. The conclusion has been made about the preservation of the idea of antagonism of subjects and the image of the enemy as an antagonist, necessary for the implementation of the constructivist nature of the human and the political, for the creation of norms of interaction.
ideas explication, social institution, classical Marxism, neo-Marxism, post-Marxism, state paradigm, subjects antagonism, image of enemy, practices, order, norm, the political
1. Artamoshin S. V. “The Problem of the Political in Carl Schmitt’s Conservative Writings”. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta ser. Gumanitarnyye nauki = Tambov University Review ser. Humanities 7 (75) (2009): 350—356. (In Russian).
2. Balakleyets N. A., Bakshutova E. V., Mukhametshina N. S. “The Antagonistic Dimension of the Political: From Carl Schmitt to Chantal Mouffe”. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta ser. Filosofiya 5.2 (2023): 51—60. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17673/vsgtu-phil.2023.2.6
3. Gololobov I. V. “Ernesto Laclau’s theory of political discourse: Introduction”. Byulleten′: antropologiya, men′shinstva, mul′tikul′turalizm = Bulletin: Anthropology, Minorities, Multiculturalism 3 (2003): 129—135. (In Russian).
4. Gurin K. E. “Analysis of disourses as the way of studying social structures, identities and processes in the theory of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe”. Kul’tura, lichnost’, obshchestvo v sovremennom mire: Metodologiya, opyt empiricheskogo issledovaniya: materialy XVII Mezhdunar. konf. pamyati prof. L. N. Kogana (20—21 marta 2014). Yekaterinburg: UrFU, 2014. 185—192. (In Russian).
5. Dorogov D. A. “From Politics to Critique and Back: Deconstruction of Universalist Political Ontologies in Post-Marxist Philosophy”. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A. S. Pushkina = Pushkin Leningrad State University Journal 2.3 (2014): 155—163. (In Russian).
6. Marmazova O. I., Marmazova T. R. “Contra-Supremacy of Antonio Gramsci’s as an Integral Part of the Neomarksist Political Theory”. Kul′tura i tsivilizatsiya (Donetsk) = Culture and Civilization (Donetsk) 1 (7) (2018): 74—78. (In Russian).
7. Matveev I. A. “Ernesto Laclau’s Political Discourse Analysis”. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta ser. 12 Politicheskiye nauki = Lomonosov Political Science Journal 3 (2009): 69—74. (In Russian).
8. Mikhaylovskiy V. S. “Neo-Marxis Quest for Revolution and Its Agents”. Istoriya i sovremennost’ 2 (26) (2017): 247—264. (In Russian).
9. Orisheva O. F. “ ‘Political’ and ‘Social’ in Post-Marxist Theory of Hegemony”. Trudy BGTU No. 5 Istoriya. Filosofiya. Filologiya = Proceedings of BSTU ser. V History. Philosophy. Philology 5 (XVIII) (2010): 136—139. (In Russian).
10. Puyu U. V. “The Problem of Manipulation and Power in the Theoretical Heritage of A. Gramshi”. Filosofiya prava = Philosophy of Law 6 (31) (2008): 10—16. (In Russian).
11. Ragozin N. “A. Gramsci’s ‘Philosophy of Practice’ as Theoretical Basis of the Concept of Spiritual Production”. Kul’tura i tsivilizatsiya (Donesk) = Culture and Civilization (Donetsk) 2 (4) (2016): 7—25. (In Russian).
12. Savin N. “Breaking With Carl Schmitt: The Concept of the Political in Chantal Mouffe’s Agonistic Pluralism”. Logos 25.6 (108) (2015): 163—179. (In Russian).
13. Savino G. “The Norm of Political Moral: The Intellectual Project of Antonio Gramsci”. Sotsiologiya vlasti = Sociology of Power 29.2 (2017): 84—96. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2017-2-84-96
14. Fomin K. V. “Models of Political Identification (C. Taylor, E. Laclau, C. Mouffe)”. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta ser. Gumanitarnyye i sotsial’nyye nauki = Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University ser. Humanitarian and Social Sciences 2 (2017): 90—98. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2227-6564.2017.2.90
15. Laclau E., Mouffe Ch. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London; NewYork: Verso, 1985. 197 p.
16. Mouffe Ch. On the Political. New York: Routledge, 2005. 150 p.
