employee
Russian Federation
employee
Russian Federation
The authors consider the problem of mesoeconomic systems diagnostics in the course of evolutionary transition to Industry 5.0. The hypothesis of the existence of three factors determining the development of the economic system under conditions of transition to Industry 5.0 has been put forward and substantiated. The classification of diagnostics of mesoeconomic systems in the state of transition to Industry 5.0 is proposed. The proposed procedure is based on a set of indicators reflecting the process of convergence of human capital, innovation, digital technologies, and greening.
Industry 5.0, digitalization, innovations, technological sovereignty, greening, human capital, mesoeconomic system, factor analysis
1. Azieva R. H., Taimaskhanov H. E. “Moderniza tion of the Oil and Gas Industry in the Style of Industry 5.0”. Finansovyj biznes 2 (212) (2021): 82—86. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KXIEGK.
2. Babkin A. V., Shkarupeta E. V., Plotnikov V. A. “Intersectorial Development Potential Management under Industry 5.0: Theory, Tools and Practical Applications”. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii = Economic Revival of Russia 2 (72) (2022): 50—65. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2022-2-72-50-65 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VMAPKI.
3. Gasanov Eyvaz A. “A New Form of Human and Machine Connection in the Industry 5.0 Production Model”. Ekonomika i upravlenie innovatsiyami = Economics and Innovation Management 3 (22) (2022): 39—49. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26730/2587-5574-2022-3-39-49 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DIJAWZ.
4. Dobrynina M. “Global Industrial Renaissance and New Industrial Policy of Russia: Economic and Political Dimensions”. Vestnik Za baikal’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta 26.1 (2020): 114—122. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21209/2227-9245-2020-26-1 114-122 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YSEIHS.
5. Evgenev G. B. “Industry 5.0 as Integration of the Internet of Knowledge and the Internet of Things”. Ontologiya proektirovaniya = Ontology of Designing 9.1 (31) (2019): 7—23. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18287/2223-9537-2019-9-1-7-23 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BQILFE.
6. Babkin A. V., Koryagin S. I., Liberman I. V., Klachek P. M., Bogdanova A. A., Saghatelyan N. H. “Industry 5.0: A Neuro-Digital Tool for Strategic Goal-Setting and Planning”. Tekhniko-tekhnologicheskie problemy servisa 3 (61) (2022): 64—85. (In Russian). EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WVJSLU.
7. Trofimova N. N. “Industry 5.0 as a New Direction of Industrial Development”. Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, resheniya = Economics and Management: Problems, Solutions 5.1 (133) (2023): 24—28. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2023.01.05. 003 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CGSPRB.
8. Demir Kadir Alpaslan, Döven Gözde, Sezen Bülent. “Industry 5.0 and Human-Robot Co-working”. Procedia Computer Science 158 (2019): 688—695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.104
9. Diseph Emma-Ikata, Doyle-Kent Mary. “Indus try 5.0 Readiness — ‘Optimization of the Rela tionship between Humans and Robots in Manu facturing Companies in Southeast of Ireland’”. IFAC-PapersOnLine 55.39 (2022): 419—424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.12.071
10. “Industry 5.0 & Industrial Upcycling”. Eco Amet Solutions. Cop. 2021. Web. 05 Aug. 2023. .
11. Hein-Pensel Franziska, Winkler Heiner, Brück ner Anja et al. “Maturity Assessment for Industry 5.0: A Review of Existing Maturity Models”. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 66 (2023): 200—210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.12.009
